Family of God: [Church_of_Christ] Re: Can you guess?

Ed said:
For a thing to be an example it must have been intended to be an example by the Lord.

Clay's response:
Now Ed add one more thing to your above statement and I'm thinking you are on your way to "understanding God"

"For a thing to be an example it must have been intended to be an example by the Lord"

ADD TO THAT Ed THE FOLLOWING

One can EASILY determine this by READING the COMMAND, a thus saith the Lord that produced this EXAMPLE. Then this EXAMPLE is binding. All other examples are incidental without a command from God is incidental to history.

Now Bro Ed your understanding would be in keeping with the will of God.

"DO NOT GO BEYOND WHAT IS WRITTEN."..........God

This is what YOUR instruction would now look like Ed, making it God's instruction:

"For a thing to be an example it must have been intended to be an example by the Lord" One can EASILY determine this by READING the COMMAND, a thus saith the Lord, that produced this EXAMPLE. Then this EXAMPLE is binding. All other examples are incidental without a command from God is incidental to history.

Follow examples, when a command is issued that would cause the example to be a parrioting of that specific command.

To do anything other than that is called, manipulation by uninspired man to justify what"HE" wanted God to command so that his actions make him "distinct" from all other sincere followers of "commands"

Clay

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (123) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Database | Polls

Participation guidelines: List policies are posted in the files area as listpolicies.html

We don't want to see you go, but if you must, the address is Church_of_Christ-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com